|
1
|
|
|
2
|
- INTRODUCTION
- IDENTIFICATION of the TOPIC
- ALTERNATIVE VIEWS of the M&S BODY-of-KNOWLEGE
- SPECIFICATION of an M&S CODE-of-ETHICS
- DISCUSSION
- CONCLUSION
|
|
3
|
- STATUS:
- There is no satisfactory specification of the Body-of-Knowledge or a
Code-of-Ethics for the M&S Profession / Industry
- NEED:
- Shared perception of the BoK and CoE is necessary for recognition of
M&S as profession / industry
- OPPORTUNITY:
- Motivation is increasing
- Administrative venues are available
- INTENTION:
- Do it! (e.g. SimSummit in July
2002)
|
|
4
|
- A variety of potential uses for BoK / CoE exist
- Establishing the domain of the profession / industry
- Educational curricular development
- Professional certification
- Professional society agendas
- …
- A variety of alternative forms or expression exist as candidates
- We want to select / develop some form(s) of expression which is / are
fit for our intended use(s)
|
|
5
|
|
|
6
|
- Alternative perspectives on an Ontology / Taxonomy for specification of
the M&S Body-of-Knowledge:
- Bruce Fairchild – synoptic, eclectic
- Lou Birta – concise, focused
- Bernie Ziegler – theoretic, architectural
|
|
7
|
- SCS Transactions December 2000, “Ethical Issues in Modeling and
Simulation”
- Tuncer Ören – “Responsibility, Ethics, and Simulation”
|
|
8
|
- What should be done to capture the specification of a Body-of-Knowledge
for the M&S profession / Industry?
- …a Code-of-Ethics?
- What are you willing to do
|
|
9
|
- DECISION …
- ACTION …
- Subscribe an interest…have an effect on BoK: BoK@SCS.org
- Subscribe an interest…have an effect on CoE: Ethics@SCS.org
- SimSummit Agenda Item: SimSummit@SCS.org
|